点评详情
发布于:2018-11-2 10:37:51  访问:62 次 回复:0 篇
版主管理 | 推荐 | 删除 | 删除并扣分
Un-Answered Questions Around Bafilomycin A1 Unveiled
Method? Forty-five patients undergoing LAR (n?=?234) entered into a randomized multicentre trial (NCT 00636948), who developed symptomatic anastomotic leakage, were identified. A comparison was made between patients diagnosed during the initial hospital stay on median postoperative day 8 (early leakage, EL; n?=?27) and patients diagnosed after hospital discharge at median postoperative day 22 (late leakage, LL; n?=?18). Patient characteristics, operative details, postoperative course and anatomical localization of the leakage were analysed. Results? Leakage from the circular stapler line of an end-to-end anastomosis was more common in EL, while leakage from the stapler line of the efferent limb of the J-pouch or side-to-end anastomosis https://www.selleckchem.com/products/Bafilomycin-A1.html tended to be more frequent in LL (P?=?0.057). Intra-operative blood loss (P?=?0.006) and operation time (P?=?0.071) Phosphoprotein phosphatase were increased in EL compared with LL. On postoperative day 5, EL performed worse than LL with regard to temperature (P?=?0.021), oral intake (P?=?0.006) and recovery of bowel activity (P?=?0.054). Anastomotic leakage was diagnosed most often by a rectal contrast study in EL and by CT scan in LL. The median initial hospital stay was 28?days for EL and 10?days for LL (P?Ponatinib solubility dmso rectal prolapse were categorized by surgical approach to repair (perineal or abdominal) and abdominal cases were further subdivided by procedure (resection compared with rectopexy alone). Univariate and multivariate analyses compared major and minor complication rates between the groups. Results? Of 1275 patients, the perineal group (n?=?706, 55%) was older, with more comorbidity, than those undergoing an abdominal procedure. There were fewer minor (odd ratio (OR)?=?0.35; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.20�C0.60; P?=?0.0038) and major complications (OR?=?0.46; 95% CI, 0.31�C0.80; P?=?0.0038) in the perineal compared with the abdominal cohort. There was a significant increase in major complications amongst patients undergoing a resection compared with rectopexy only (OR?=?2.15; 95% CI, 1.10�C4.41; P?=?0.0299). There was no difference in major complications between abdominal rectopexy and a perineal approach, but the latter had a lower chance of minor complications (OR?=?0.47; 95% CI, 0.24�C0.94; P?=?0.0287). Conclusion? A perineal approach is safer than an abdominal approach to the treatment of rectal prolapse. Regarding an abdominal operation, rectopexy has fewer major complications than resection.
共0篇回复 每页10篇 页次:1/1
共0篇回复 每页10篇 页次:1/1
我要回复
回复内容
验 证 码
看不清?更换一张
匿名发表 
当前位置
脚注信息

美博梁sir2010-2017版权所有